Raamleela

Beginning moments give a glimpse of hostility and motif of revenge in form of foreshadowing. Title is suggestive and symbol of couple’s devotion to love and they are puppets. Categories that story falls under are:  Tragedy, revengeful narrative with extreme level of rivalry , a story to indicate an apply to imbibe, passion of love and a characteristic never to seize any opportunity, a narrative of bribery and to lead it to culmination of destruction, a story full of puppet show in case of the couple. One of the biggest crimes is to let enemy go without his destruction including women and children. Slanging reflects culture more than dressing or way of living. The use of language is pathetic. The story is archetypal of species and cruel side in desert, gloomy state but affair of love is like impossibility and “a rose” that has sprouted from infertility of land. A region splitted into species is horrible. Sweet vulgarity in form of passion of love romanticizes to culminate love as well as hostility. Couple’s eccentricities with eccentric behaviors please or arouse aesthetic delight of slanging where taking revenge leads to the loss of worth of life. People who have been portrayed are spendthrifts not those kind of who spend money in extravagant way with insanity,  but they feel free, out of cage to behave according to their mentality. Pride insists on honor’s staying and honor insists on dignity’s staying at ultimate level.

In gloomy state of region where blind belongingness plays vital role, it also becomes symbol of love and empowerment of women where women are never betrayed but they can be slanged and it is a region where  a woman empowers herself in extravagant or threatening way. People’s characteristics are their eccentricities and insanity in form of drawbacks and discernment. 

Nature of love is hard to interpret. It is personification of self- abnegation, devotion to love discernment and its realization in positive sense. The technique of portraying characters with dialect and nature characteristic is noteworthy. Rama- the hero who seems to understand the need to end the war and hostility is puppet under cruel form of rivalry where belongingness plays a major role. For every character, that belongingness has to do with caste, religion and family. It gives notion of identity with sense of self – abnegation in love and devotion. Here love accompanies belongingness but motif of love neither destroys belongingness nor itself. Old definition of self sacrifice exists itself in every story. It’s not that kind of angle of hostility where people use one another’s jealousy to their benefit but in spite of being aware of rivalry, they remain so consistent with their own intentions and about what they are supposed to do. True essence of love lies here. People are endowed with animosity .  “ love at first sight” and “ lack of timidity” add charm to the main definition of love. Somehow it too feels , had there been lack of timidity, it would have survived the couple. Sweet ordeals in love matter or test to taste love have been true essences of love. Cruelty and bribery increase the sense of tragedy.

One of the ideal issues has been understanding and friendship between two women. Realism in the world creates negative aspect of it and it says a woman becomes the reason of downfall of another woman. But here womanhood has been given ideal touch. A woman understands another woman here. Especially they understand “the self of woman” ! They forget their relations for discerning each other. For them, “happiness of a woman “  is prioritized. One of the beautiful things - portrayed in the movie. Adherence to hostility leads to adversity and destruction of family. Nature of rivalry is prioritized with no lack of belongingness.

Romantic side is shown rather than cultural conflict. There is no difference between both the cultures. Culture is the same.Characteristics are the same. Nature is the same. Attitude is the same. Way of living is the same. Thoughts are the same. Why have they been bent on displaying their strength and showing it off to each other? They don’t seem to identify the similarities but they identify differences. In motif of hostility, agony has to be decreased and there should be no efforts to peep into  “differences”  but similarities should be found! Similarities bring people together and assemble them. But realization comes at the end and it is proved futile when lovers are dead! Love makes its way to come out from unwilling betrayal, intrigues and aroused misunderstandings. Love is like puppet in hands of fate or nature of rivalry but it is strength that makes them overcome circumstance. Love is like “ one man army” ! Main conflict is with display of weapons , intrigues and dominance. One can overcome person physically but not mentally. Loved ones can never be won by showing weapons or threatening effect. Threat never affects the couple rather it lets them be more powerful.  “Nature of threat”  in such movies plays vital role! Peacefulness or happiness can never be bought with weapons in hand, abomination in heart and dominance in region.

The character of Raam seems to be full of liveliness but empty with futility of rivalry and war! For his romantic nature love is more than any rivalry but Shakespearean hero is always destined to tragic doom. A person always yearns for the things which he has never got in his life. Perhaps from his adolescent period love has been lacking in gloomy atmosphere of war. He has grown up in the family that has always introduced him to hostility and how to perform against enemy! Only ordeal in this region is “ be the same, as same as your enemy.” When you put stress on spring, it will surely make its way to come out! Spring will jump upwards all of a sudden as soon as it is forced to slip back into somewhere.  Love is just like this. If you are not provided with it, it will start arousing   itself and will  peep into yourself which has always been deprived. Rama’s going to his beloved’s home shows his “has been remaining aim” to put an end to war and it shows “ his ideal being “ in form of rising action! Self- abnegation has been the outcome of love .Martyr-like death is somehow acceptable and but somehow not! Does love story only exist when there will be self- sacrifice? The way love is philosophized is noteworthy.  

Generally love disappears when one of the beloveds’  “belongingness”  takes place but the outcome has really been interpretive!